Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Composure under pressure. Technical accuracy is the baseline everyone should meet; what actually holds up in a deposition or on the stand is the ability to explain complex findings in plain language and defend them consistently, no matter how the questioning is angled.
Often more useful there than at trial itself. A clear, visual exhibit tends to accelerate settlement negotiations by replacing a dispute over impressions with a finding both sides can actually see and understand.
Over 26 years of professional practice, including direct testimony and affidavit work across multiple NYC county courts, New York State Supreme Court, and throughout Long Island.
Both, ideally. Early involvement lets the findings and exhibits get shaped around the specific legal argument being built, rather than handing counsel a finished report and asking them to work backward from it.
That’s precisely the scenario deposition-ready reporting is built for: every finding is documented with the methodology and reasoning transparent enough to defend directly against a competing expert’s conclusions, not just to state a result.


