Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Courts weigh the physical dimensions of the defect alongside its location, lighting, foot traffic, and surrounding context; there’s no single magic number. What tips the scales is precise, defensible measurement rather than a witness’s estimate of “about an inch or so,” which is exactly the gap our field analysis closes.
Faster than feels necessary. Repairs, weather, and simple time can quietly erase the only physical evidence that will ever exist of the condition; we typically mobilize within 48 hours specifically to prevent that window from closing.
Yes, and often that’s where it does the most work. A clear, scaled exhibit tends to shorten negotiations dramatically, because it replaces a “he-said, she-said” dispute with a number nobody can argue with.
Substantially. A standard survey establishes boundaries and improvements; a §7-210 report is built specifically to answer a legal liability question, with slope, height-differential, and maintenance-history findings framed against the exact code language a court will apply.
It’s still worth a call. Photographs, prior complaints, permit records, and neighboring conditions can sometimes reconstruct enough of the picture to support a defense, though nothing replaces the strength of measurements taken before repairs occur, which is why speed matters so much on the front end.


